A few months ago I wrote about this new refrigerant as having the catastrophic risk of a BLEVE event. Now I wish to offer some guidance on how a business utilizing this refrigerant can reduce the likelihood of this type of event.  First, there are NO engineering standards that guide a manufacturer of an ASME pressure vessel in how to construct a pressure vessel so that it will not fail in a BLEVE event. So we can not assume that our vessel is so well designed or constructed that it will with withstand either a hot or cold BLEVE.  Our FIRST LINE of defense in managing BLEVE risk(s) is the placement of our pressure vessel(s). If our facility is in a state with an adopted fire/HAZMAT code(s) we will find some baseline “facility siting” instructions in these state-adopted codes. But this new refrigerant has no specific code(s) to aid a business in how they should manage their “facility siting”. However, there are some codes and RAGAGEPs designed for other Category 1 Flammable Gases (which HFO-1234yf is) and it is these codes and RAGAGEPs I turn to when asked about tank location.

You have no rights to post comments

 
View 's profile on LinkedIn

 

 LinkedIn Group Button

facebookIcon

 

Partner Organizations

 Chlroine Institute Logo 100 years

I am proud to announce that

The Chlorine Institute and SAFTENG

have extended our"Partners in Safety" agreement

for another year (2024)

CI Members, send me an e-mail

to request your FREE SAFTENG membership

 

RCECHILL BW

  

kemkey logo

OHS Solutions logoCEMANE power association logo

 EIT LOGO

 

Member Associations

ASME logo

 

Screen Shot 2018 05 28 at 10.25.35 PM

aiche logo cmyk highres

Chlorine institute

 nfpa logo.5942a119dcb25

 

TOCAS

 

BLR Logo 2018

 

 

 

 

safteng man copy

 

 organdonor