The debate rages on in process safety circles as to how one can "pressure test" their piping that was installed using ASME B31 series of RAGAGEPs.  It has always been "the rule" that we use the hydrostatic method UNLESS this method would cause a hazard or purity concern; however, as with most practices we have come to find this no longer "the rule" but rather "an option" and I beg to differ and the IFC and ASME tend to agree with me when it comes to existing piping.  Why is this just now an issue with existing piping?  Simply, businesses are just now getting around to ensuring their process "complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices".  Yes, over 25 years later, PSM/RMP facilities are just getting around to "pressure testing" their piping and this "existing piping" has some special restrictions on how it can be "pressure tested"...

You have no rights to post comments

 
View 's profile on LinkedIn

 

 LinkedIn Group Button

facebookIcon

 

Partner Organizations

 Chlroine Institute Logo 100 years

I am proud to announce that

The Chlorine Institute and SAFTENG

have extended our"Partners in Safety" agreement

for another year (2024)

CI Members, send me an e-mail

to request your FREE SAFTENG membership

 

RCECHILL BW

  

kemkey logo

OHS Solutions logoCEMANE power association logo

 EIT LOGO

 

Member Associations

ASME logo

 

Screen Shot 2018 05 28 at 10.25.35 PM

aiche logo cmyk highres

Chlorine institute

 nfpa logo.5942a119dcb25

 

TOCAS

 

BLR Logo 2018

 

 

 

 

safteng man copy

 

 organdonor