SAFTENG Safety Info Posts SAFTENG Safety Info Posts
Proper LOTO or a serious problem? (POLL) PDF Print E-mail
Safety Info Posts - Lockout Tagout
Written by Bryan Haywood   
Wednesday, 04 May 2011 19:54

In the past couple of years I have come across these lockout devices for light switches.  I even witnessed an OSHA Outreach Trainer using a picture of a similar device in a 10-hr OSHA course during his LOTO presentation.  Now I know that a light switch can be wired a special way that could make it an isolation device; but I would bet that 99.99% of light switches are NOT wired such that when they are in the OFF position they are a POSITIVE MEANS of energy isolation.  Light Switches are CONTROL DEVICES and OSHA's definition of an "Energy Isolating Device" states it is a mechanical device that physically prevents the transmission or release of energy, including but not limited to the following: A manually operated electrical circuit breaker; a disconnect switch; a manually operated switch by which the conductors of a circuit can be disconnected from all ungrounded supply conductors, and, in addition, no pole can be operated independently; a line valve; a block; and any similar device used to block or isolate energy. The definition also states the following...Push buttons, selector switches and other control circuit type devices are not energy isolating devices.  I am claiming that light switches are "control circuit type devices".  To me the use of these devices is a clear cut violation of 1910.147.  The authorized employee should use a breaker or disconnect to do work on the light.  Turning the light switch off and hanging one of the devices and your LOTO lock on the device then cutting the wires to the ballast will result in an electrofying experience for the worker!!  What do you think?  Vote in the poll below and let me know.  If you disagree, PLEASE post your position and why you feel they are legal in the comments section below.

Would you allow these light switch lockout devices to be used in your LOTO program?
YES
NO
Results


 

Comments  

 
0 #2 L2HALLMAN@GMAIL.COM 2011-05-26 15:25
My vote is no because they should not be routinely used with the assumption that they provide adequate protection.
If the application is evaluated and there is a postive means of verifying isolation, they may be appropriate.
Quote
 
 
+1 #1 Ken Carter 2011-05-04 20:58
THe problem with lockout devices like this is that they offer no protection when the lightfittings are wired in a loop which is the case mostly in Australia. they are OK to change a light bulb but the fittings can be still "Live" at the wiring and if you complete the circuit or connect to the Ground with your body you can still be electrocuted.
Quote
 
 

wreck it all 

Members Usage Guide

 

 Please Support My

Partners in Safety!

 

MEA-SFTENG

 

 organdonor

 

 safteng_man

911_4

Some of Our Key Clients

What They Are Saying About Us...

I worked with Bryan to get his views on an upcoming Ammonia Refrigeration Process Safety publication. We spent an entire day going over the work and his input was of excellent value. Bryan understands Process Safety on a deep level and brings a wealth of knowledge concerning best practices to the...

Brian Chapin
Date: Jan 31, 2012