SAFTENG Safety Info Posts SAFTENG Safety Info Posts
Newsletter (9/9/11) PDF Print E-mail
Safety Info Posts - Newsletters
Written by Bryan Haywood   
Saturday, 10 September 2011 19:31

 


index.9
PureSafety_SAFTENG_orginal
MEA-SFTENG

 

MANY THANKS to my NEW & RENEWING "Partners in Safety"for their support!

amg_vanadium abbott_logo
polyone scon_inc_logo

AMG Vanadium since 2008, Abbott since 2008, Polyone since 7/11, S-Con, Inc since 7/11

911_4

 

In this week’s Newsletter

Features:

  •  New OSHA Video Provides Education on Fall Protection
  •  Erratum and clarification statement issued for ANSI/ISEA 103-2011 standard on chemical protective clothing
  •  Oregon OSHA provides some GREAT Confined Space guidance
  •  OSHA issues 2011 annual inspection plan for protecting workers in high-hazard workplaces
  •  Fall protection on aerial lifts during construction activities

Side Bar Items:

  •  SAFTENG Blog & SAFTENG LinkedIn Forum
 
  • Safety and Health Tip – Fire Prevention Week Webinar
   
  •  Civilian Fire Fatalities
   
  •  Safety Recalls
   
  •  EHS Events

New OSHA Video Provides Education on Fall Protection

In a new video aimed at preventing fatal falls in residential construction, OSHA provides safety methods for preventing deaths from falls and discusses techniques used by employers during different stages of construction. Procedures such as the use of bracket scaffolds, anchors, safety net systems, safety harnesses and lines, and guardrails for activities like installing roof trusses and sheathing, decking, reroofing, and installing walls are explained in the presentation.  The video is part of OSHA’s Residential Fall Protection Compliance Assistance program, which tries to help employers and workers in the residential construction industry comply with Fall Protection standard requirements. Fifty workers died from falls during residential construction in 2010, according to the 2010 Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS).

 

Erratum and clarification statement issued for ANSI/ISEA 103-2011 standard on chemical protective clothing

It has been brought to ISEA's attention that ANSI/ISEA 103-2010 American National Standard for Classification and Performance Requirements for Chemical Protective Clothing contains an error in Note a) of Table 3, Performance Requirements for Materials, with respect to the reference for abrasion resistance.  Such note is applicable only to flex cracking resistance, not abrasion resistance, as indicated in the note.  Text within the body of the standard related to abrasion resistance testing in Section 7.12 and Appendix B remains correct.  The unintentional oversight was committed during the editing of the final document for publication.  As such, ISEA is issuing this erratum to correct the oversight noting the accurate text of Table 3 as stated below:
NOTE a).  Flex cracking resistance, using a determination of leakage consistent with the expected integrity of the clothing material.  Category 1, 2 and 3 clothing materials are evaluated using a pressure test; Category 4, 5 and 6 clothing materials are evaluated for visual damage.  Additionally, the subscript a) in the table attributed to abrasion resistance is not applicable.
CLARIFICATION
ISEA has received numerous questions regarding the requirements for permeation (Section 7.5) and liquid penetration under pressure testing (Section 7.6) of ANSI/ISEA 103-2010.  To provide clarification on the requirements for testing and compliance purposes, ISEA notes the following:
It is NOT required that a product achieve a Level L for each of the agents listed in ASTM F1001 (as referenced by incorporation for testing), in order be compliant.  However, the manufacturer’s test report must include the requisite information stated in Section 12.2.2 (for permeation resistance) and Section 12.2.3 (for penetration pressure).    When the material does not achieve any of the performance levels established by the standard for a given agent, it is expected that the product technical information will clearly indicate this in some manner.  The reader of such information should understand that the material is not classified to the ANSI/ISEA 103 standard for the agent in question.

 

OSHA issues 2011 annual inspection plan for protecting workers in high-hazard workplaces

OSHA issued its annual inspection plan under the Site-Specific Targeting* 2011 (SST-11) program to help the agency direct enforcement resources to high-hazard workplaces where the highest rates of injuries and illnesses occur.  The SST program is OSHA's main programmed inspection plan for non-construction workplaces that have 20 or more workers. High-hazard workplaces identified in the SST program reported above-average work-related injury and illness rates, based on data collected from a 2010 OSHA Data Initiative survey of 80,000 larger establishments in selected high-hazard industries. Establishments are randomly selected for inspection from a primary list of 3,700 manufacturing, non-manufacturing, and nursing and personal care facilities.  Two changes have been made to this year's SST program. In 2010, only those establishments in the selected industries with 40 or more employees were subject to inspections under the SST plan; this year, that number has been reduced to 20 or more. An evaluation study measuring the program's impact on future compliance with OSHA standards has also been introduced for the 2011 program.

 

Oregon OSHA provides some GREAT Confined Space guidance

OR-OSHA is proposing a Construction Standard for CS Entry.  In the proposed standard, they have introduced a nice table to help users understand the parts of the standard that applies to different space and entry options.  They have also published a NEW evaluation flow chart that makes the eval MUCH simpler, as they have defined some critical terms such as “designed for continuous occupancy”, “limited means of egress”, etc.  I know that this is coming from a State OSHA Plan, but there is absolutely no reason why we can not use this information in our safety programs.

OR_PRCS

Click Here (pdf) to see the proposed reg and the items mentioned.


Fall protection on aerial lifts during construction activities

On January 14, 2009, OSHA issued a letter of interpretation regarding the use of a particular shock absorbing lanyard to satisfy the requirements found in §1926.453(b)(2)(v).  The Directorate of Construction has received inquires from regional offices, area offices, and the public asking if the January 2009 letter banned the lanyard in question.  OSHA did not ban the particular lanyard but stated, based on the manufacturer's instructions, which stipulated a minimum anchor point height of 18.5 feet, that it was likely that the lanyard's use would not comply with OSHA standards at lower heights.  In such cases, use of the lanyard below 18.5 feet would apparently not provide adequate fall protection.  This determination has raised questions about the use of body harnesses, typically married with appropriate lanyards, for fall protection in aerial lifts.  To help avoid any confusion on the issue, DOC is rescinding the January 2009 letter, #20070823-7896.  Under subpart L, employers must ensure that employees tie off at all times when working from an aerial lift [§1926.453(b)(2)(v)].  Employers must ensure that employees using personal fall arrest systems while working on aerial lifts at heights six feet or more above a lower level comply with §1926.502(d) of subpart M, specifically: Personal fall arrest systems, when stopping a fall, shall: ...(iii) be rigged such that an employee can neither free fall more than 6 feet (1.8 m), nor contact any lower level.  [§1926.502(d)(16)(iii)] However, §1926.502(d) does not require employers to comply with manufacturer's instructions when using personal fall arrest systems.  To cite §1926.502(d)(16)(iii), the facts must show that the personal fall arrest system would permit a free fall of more than six feet or would permit contact with a lower level - and not base this conclusion solely on information provided by the manufacturer.  As has been the Agency's longstanding policy, an employer may comply with OSHA's fall protection requirements for aerial lifts in one of three ways:

  1. Use of a body belt with a tether anchored to the boom or basket (fall restraint system),
  2. Use of a body harness with a tether (fall restraint system), or
  3. Use of a body harness with a lanyard (fall arrest system).

Click Here to see the Memo. 

MEMBERSHIP SPECIAL: Due to our Corporate Support this year and because so many safety professionals have fallen on hard times, I have decided to extend the special NEW Membership fee of $30 for everyone.  Of course anyone can join for FREE by becoming a “contributor of materials” for me to posts.  Just use the “Renewal Option” and send me an e-mail letting me know you are a NEW MEMBER and I will set you up within 24 hours.

 

SAFTENG Blog & 

SAFTENG LinkedIn Forum  

Click Here to Join the Safety Engineering Network (SAFTENG) Forum on LinkedIn forum.  It's FREE! We now have 1,339 members  

NOTE:  If you and I are not "Linked" send me an invitation and I will accept.  I accept ALL invitations from safety professionals.  Also, if you use LinkedIn PLEASE consider joining the Safety Engineering Network LinkedIn Forum. 

Jobs posted on SAFTENG LinkedIn Forum:

  •  Exciting position available for EH&S Engineer in New Hampshire
  •  Process Engineer - London - EPC - Permanent basis
  •  Safety Engineer - London - EPC - Permanent basis
  •  EH&S Specialist
  •  Industrial Safety Products - Business Development Manager (m/f) Oil & Gas Germany
  •  Opening for Level 4 SSHO, EM-385 cert, 10 years safety experience, Immediate start, SoCal Area, 14 month duration

Safety and Health Tip 

Fire Prevention Week webinar

"Getting to Know Fire Prevention Week"
In this FREE webinar, NFPA public education staff will share Fire Prevention Week resources and strategies.

September 14, 2011
12:00-1:00 pm

Join us September 14 

 

Civilian Fire Fatalities 

On September 9, 2011, 3 residential fire fatalities were reported by news media throughout the United States. 

 

Safety Recalls

KTM North America Recalls Off-Road Motorcycles Due to Fall or Crash Hazard

Dolls Recalled by Pottery Barn Kids Due To Strangulation Hazard

Target Recalls to Repair Embark Resistance Cords Due to Injury Hazard

LED Night Lights Recalled by Camsing Global Due to Burn Hazard

Wooden Rattle Recalled by Manhattan Group Due to Choking Hazard

Vehicles Recalls  

Tires Recalls 

Child Safety Seat Recalls 

 

EHS Events 

2011 Georgia Safety, Health and Environmental Conference  

September 6-9, 2011 

Savannah, GA

 

PureSafety User Conference 

Sept. 13-16, 2011

Nashville, TN

Click To Register Today 

 

NJ ASSE Summer PDC  

September 14, 2011 

Sayreville, NJ

 

Joint OSHA, LCCA, Abbott Safety Day

Sept. 22, 2011

OPEN to ALL

Waukegan, IL

Topic is Subpart CC

 

Mary Kay O'Connor Process Safety Center International Symposium 

October 25-27, 2011 

College Station, TX 

 

If you have a conference or an outing for your safety organization, let me now and I can help spread the message.  And yes, posting is FREE! 

 
 

wreck it all 

Members Usage Guide

 

 Please Support My

Partners in Safety!

 

MEA-SFTENG

 

 organdonor

 

 safteng_man

911_4

Some of Our Key Clients

What They Are Saying About Us...

“I have seen first hand the level of training that Bryan's company provides and it is top notch. Bryan's background is well rounded and makes him an excellent resource not only as a provider of training but as someone that can get your safety program on track or enhance it.”

Rob Lindsay
Date: Apr 01, 2010