Not many know this dirty little secret about overpressure protection on ASME-coded vessels (formerly called "code case 2211"), but I will let the cat out of the bag... Not all ASME pressure vessels have to have a pressure relief device, and I am not talking about those very small vessels, but any size vessel. No, I am not crazy, it is a fact. Since 1996 ASME has allowed this practice by issuing "Code Case 2211". Code Case 2211 was first approved in 1996 and reaffirmed until it became UG-140 in 2008. I am in NO WAY advocating this practice, but it is an option and is used in certain processes where relief devices can be easily compromised due to relieving events. This article is to inform those who want to know more about this practice and to ensure that those who are already utilizing UG-140 have all the required documentation on hand.

In NO WAY does ASME want this to be the first choice of users, but rather an option in some very specific circumstances. But in some applications, the use of pressure relief devices may be impractical. Some situations may include:

You have no rights to post comments

 
View 's profile on LinkedIn

 

 LinkedIn Group Button

facebookIcon

 

Partner Organizations

 Chlroine Institute Logo 100 years

I am proud to announce that

The Chlorine Institute and SAFTENG

have extended our"Partners in Safety" agreement

for another year (2024)

CI Members, send me an e-mail

to request your FREE SAFTENG membership

 

RCECHILL BW

  

kemkey logo

OHS Solutions logoCEMANE power association logo

 EIT LOGO

 

Member Associations

ASME logo

 

Screen Shot 2018 05 28 at 10.25.35 PM

aiche logo cmyk highres

Chlorine institute

 nfpa logo.5942a119dcb25

 

TOCAS

 

BLR Logo 2018

 

 

 

 

safteng man copy

 

 organdonor