OSHA responded to a report of unsafe working conditions May 17, 2016, after two employees lost consciousness and collapsed. The workers were exposed to hazardous gas while entering a sewer system. OSHA investigators found the company allowed the workers inside a confined space without having tested the space for hazards. OSHA issued citations for six serious violations and one willful violation. The agency also cited the company for failing to maintain gas testing meters and rescue equipment, and for not training all employees in confined space entry. OSHA proposed penalties of $152,147. Here is the breakdown of the citations:

OSHA has long stated that "entry permits" which contain exposure data MUST be maintained per 1910.1020.  However, this requirement seems to not be well understood.  It seems we find companies that prohibit entry into any hazardous atmosphere are keeping warehouses full of closed entry permits and those companies that are actually entering hazardous atmospheres are throwing out their permits after their annual review.  So what is the actual requirement?

Many of you that followed my incident alerts may remember the transformer manufacturer that had a fatal PRCS accident that killed two workers and left a third injured back at the end of 2015. The three people were working on a transformer in the plant and were found unresponsive. Unofficial sources said the transformer was an 8×12 unit. The Sheriff's office investigating said the first person was working inside the transformer and became unresponsive. The second and third workers entered the transformer to help the first worker and then became unresponsive. Two of the workers were pronounced dead. The third worker was taken to the hospital. OSHA has now issued their seven (7) serious citations ALL related to 1910.146...

The state of Washington's OSHA has published their DRAFT standard on Confined Spaces.  The standard pretty closely mirrors federal OSHA's 1926.1201-.1213; however, the OSHA standards in WA must be written in a much more simplified manner, thus we end up with a standard that is easier to read and WA-OSHA does an EXCELLENT job explaining the requirements with their "Summary" in each section and the special NOTES they post through out the standard.  They have also made some things more clear... for example, in their definition of a confined space they use the phrase "Not primarily designed for human occupancy" vs. "Is not designed for continuous employee occupancy" as found in Federal OSHA's definition.  For those in facilities that really want a well explained standard, this is a MUST READ.  CLICK HERE

An elevator superintendent, 41, suffocated when his lifeline tangled in an unguarded and rotating auger. OSHA investigators determined three workers, including the elevator superintendent, had been standing over the unguarded auger using a pole in an attempt to dislodge soybean debris in a grain bin that contained more than 50,000 bushels of soybeans sloped 12 to 20 feet up its walls.  A federal investigation into the worker's death found multiple violations of federal safety standards for grain handling at the facility.  On Sept. 9, 2016, OSHA issued three (3) egregious willful and three (3) serious violations following its investigation of the March 16, 2016, death. From 2011 to 2015, federal inspectors cited the Nebraska farmer-owned cooperative and joint venture six times for violating grain-handling safety standards.  The agency has placed the company in its Severe Violator Enforcement Program.  OSHA has proposed penalties of $411,540. View current citations below...

The company specializes in the cleaning of gasoline and gasoline tanks for gasoline retailers. On December 30 and 31, 2014, OSHA’s Compliance Officer (CSHO) conducted an inspection following a fatal accident at that worksite. An employee died after being found unresponsive at the bottom of a well containing a submersible turbine pump (STP) at a retail store under construction. Based upon the CSHO’s inspection, the Secretary of Labor, on May 14, 2015, issued a Citation and Notification of Penalty with three items (with subparts) alleging serious violations of 29 C.F.R. § 1910.23(a)(6) for failure to guard an open manhole; various subparts of § 1910.134 for deficiencies in its respirator program; and various subparts of § 1910.146 for failure to protect its employees from hazards associated with confined spaces. The Secretary proposed a total penalty of $13,600.00 for the Citation. Company timely contested the Citation. All of the violations are at issue.

 
View 's profile on LinkedIn

  LinkedIn Group Button

facebookIcon

 

seminar logo white

I am teaching another 1-Day Course for ASSE

Intro to Process Safety Management

February 13, 2017

The Rio, Las Vegas, NV

 

SAFETY2017

My Friend Jonathan Zimmerman and I are presenting at ASSE's Safety 2017

Topic:  Safe Work Permit Management System

Day and Time to be posted later. 

I am also working on details to do a

POST conference PSM course in CO as well.

Details to be posted later.

 

 kmcllaw logo

an unpaid endorsement

 

 

an unpaid endorsement

 

MEA SFTENG

an unpaid endorsement

 

kemkey logo

an unpaid endorsement

safteng man copy

 

 

 organdonor

 

 

Safteng.net website reputation