SAFTENG Safety Info Posts SAFTENG Safety Info Posts
2nd Quarter UPDATE with 289 Shocker and Accident Photos
Now over 13,750 exclusive unsafe acts/conditions and accident/injuries photos
and over 1,000 ppt's & doc's from more than 2,776 contributors!
 
Many THANKS to my NEW and RENEWING "Partners in Safety"
Dow Corning 2002 Logo - Color dawes logo shepherd Zion
since 2009 since 2014 since 2009 since 2009
 
OSHA PSM citations @ aerosol paint and coatings manufacturer (Flammables & $132,800)
Safety Info Posts - PSM and RMP Citations/Analysis
Written by Bryan Haywood   
Tuesday, 21 October 2014 19:54

A May 1, 2014, inspection conducted after a complaint alleging three separate fires has resulted in the issuance of eight safety violations. Many of the violations were cited under the Process Safety Management Standard. OSHA cited one willful, two repeat and five serious safety violations and proposed penalties totaling $132,800. OSHA issued one willful violation for failing to conduct necessary inspections and tests on emergency fire control, bypass and relief valves. The company failed to follow recommended inspection timetables for pumps and motors. The company was issued two repeat citations for failing to develop complete and accurate operating procedures and compile necessary process safety information. The company was cited for similar violations in 2012 at this same facility. The company failed to address the potential for static accumulation and discharge and train employees in the equipment processes and emergency shutdown procedures for the machines they were operating. The company did not ensure that procedures to maintain mechanical integrity were performed, such as inspecting valves and pipes. In addition, the company failed to inspect procedures and train workers on the hazards of servicing and maintenance, resulting in five serious violations.

NOTES: (Citations have been highlighted in red)
1) One citation was for not securing a valve in its safe position in the field as noted on the P&ID. (e.g. Car Seals)
2) Combustible dust issues were cited as they are used in the covered process.

Here is a breakdown of the citations:

Last Updated on Tuesday, 21 October 2014 20:19
 
2014 Photo of the Week #42 (Trenching)
Safety Info Posts - Photo of the Week
Written by Bryan Haywood   
Saturday, 18 October 2014 21:29

Good thing they are wearing their safety vest!!!

county

Last Updated on Saturday, 18 October 2014 21:35
 
2014 Video of the Week #42 (Confined Space FATALITY Investigation by WorkSafe BC)
Safety Info Posts - Video of the Week
Written by Bryan Haywood   
Saturday, 18 October 2014 00:00

This 3D animation re-enacts the sequence of events of the workplace incident that occurred at a mushroom composting facility in Langley, B.C. on September 5, 2008. Three workers died and two others were seriously injured in the incident.  For more information go to: http://www.worksafebc.com/news_room/news_releases/2011/new_11_11_28.asp

Last Updated on Saturday, 18 October 2014 22:26
 
How can one argue that a large roll-off trash compactor is not a PRCS?
Safety Info Posts - Permit Required Confined Spaces
Written by Bryan Haywood   
Friday, 17 October 2014 11:44

compactor1 berries lrgThis is a hot debate, sadly enough!  Here we are going on nearly 20 years of having OSHA’s Permit Required Confined Space standard (1910.146) in place and we are still debating what is and what is not a CS and PRCS.  Granted there will always be questionable spaces - that is what safety professionals are for!  But damn it, these roll off trash compactor containers are WITHOUT A DOUBT a PRCS.  And just because “our employees never enter it/them” is not an excuse to not classify it properly and label it properly to PREVENT unauthorized entry.  Let’s examine the characteristics of these containers and what makes them a PRCS…

Last Updated on Friday, 17 October 2014 11:54
 
Did you know... Ammonia (and Propane) gas is NOT white?
Safety Info Posts - Hazardous Materials
Written by Bryan Haywood   
Friday, 17 October 2014 07:32

In just about every 24-hour HAZMAT course we teach we find that students getting their first official dose of "chemical safety" are shocked to find out that most gases at their facility are NOT white in color.  Most have seen dozens of videos over their adult lives showing these large white clouds forming during releases of hazardous materials and just figured that what they were seeing was a chemical cloud.  So if ammonia (and propane) is NOT a white gas, then why do we see a white fluffy cloud when ammonia/propane is released to the atmosphere?  Chlorine gas is not white; it is yellowish-green in color.  Why the difference?

Last Updated on Friday, 17 October 2014 08:09
 
54 incidents & 1 update (10/16/14)
Safety Info Posts - Incident Alerts
Written by Bryan Haywood   
Thursday, 16 October 2014 21:30
Last Updated on Thursday, 16 October 2014 21:40
 
New Versions of CAMEOfm and Tier2 Submit are available
Safety Info Posts - Emergency Response
Written by Bryan Haywood   
Wednesday, 15 October 2014 08:26

What's new in CAMEOfm version 3.1?

  • Added new FEMA tab to Resources module to allow classifying resources based on FEMA resource typing definitions
  • Added a drop-down calendar feature for date fields
  • Modified Facility KML export to include 24-hour emergency coordinator phone numbers
  • Updated to allow import of Tier2 Submit 2014 files
  • Updated state-specific fields
  • Upgraded to FileMaker 13
  • Made minor bugs fixes and changes

CLICK HERE to download latest version of CAMEOfm version 3.1

What's changed in Tier2 Submit 2014?

  • Added "Quick Report" button, which displays the selected facility's information in a browser window
  • Added a drop-down calendar feature for date fields
  • Modified Facility KML export to include facility and 24-hour emergency coordinator phone numbers
  • Updated state-specific fields
  • Upgraded to FileMaker 13
  • Made minor bug fixes and changes

CLICK HERE to download latest version of Tier2 Submit 2014

 
Fire Dynamics: The A, B, C, D and K’s of Fire (USFA)
Safety Info Posts - Emergency Response
Written by Bryan Haywood   
Tuesday, 14 October 2014 20:30

Screen Shot 2014-10-14 at 9.31.22 PMOne of the first tasks that firefighters and inspectors learn is how to classify fires in accordance with the common letter designations. Knowing the correct fire type enables one to select the appropriate fire-extinguishing media to safely suppress a fire. Fires are classified into one of five categories based on the burning products. The following table explains the classes and the description of the primary contents involved in the fire.

There are circumstances where:

More than one class of fire may be involved. For example, a liquefied petroleum gas vessel that is venting as a result of a wildland fire exposure would be a combined Class A (vegetation) and Class B (flammable liquid/gas) fire that might require special fire suppression approaches.

A fire can change from one class to another. Class C fires are those that involve “energized electrical equipment.” Once the electrical energy is removed, the fire is classified based on the burning material. A flaming television set becomes a Class A fire when the electricity is disconnected.

Last Updated on Tuesday, 14 October 2014 20:39
 
HAZMAT Awareness - PLACARDS (video)
Safety Info Posts - Hazardous Materials
Written by Bryan Haywood   
Tuesday, 14 October 2014 20:00

Last Updated on Tuesday, 14 October 2014 20:40
 
OSHRC affirms HAZCOM and LOTO citations at chicken processing plant
Safety Info Posts - OSHA Compliance Posts
Written by Bryan Haywood   
Sunday, 12 October 2014 21:04

Citations issued for health and safety violations were affirmed by an administrative law judge from the independent OSHRC, upholding an earlier decision by the U.S. Department of Labor's Occupational Safety and Health Administration. The violations occurred at the company's chicken processing plant. OSHA cited the plant in May 2012 for a variety of safety and health hazards, including failure to provide employees with information and training about the hazards of products that contain peracetic acid and bleach, as required by OSHA's hazard communication standard. Violating OSHA's lockout/tagout standard, the company also failed to train production workers whose operations included servicing and maintenance of machines that could unexpectedly start up. Judge Coleman found the employer had failed to train production workers on the hazards of chlorine bleach and Perasafe, an antimicrobial agent containing peracetic acid, hydrogen peroxide and acetic acid, used to disinfect chicken carcasses. The judge noted in his decision that employees told the OSHA compliance officer that they had experienced respiratory ailment symptoms and rashes consistent with the exposure symptoms described in the manufacturer's safety data sheets for Perasafe and chlorine bleach. The judge also found that that the company's machine maintenance procedures were overly general, lacking sufficient detail to provide employees with the steps to protect themselves from amputation and laceration hazards while servicing equipment. Moreover, production workers were not given basic training on how to avoid injuries when service and maintenance work was needed. Two employees were injured when attempting to clear jams on equipment without knowledge of proper procedures.   OSHRC Docket Number: 12-1165 & 12-1269

Last Updated on Sunday, 12 October 2014 21:18
 
«StartPrev12NextEnd»

Page 1 of 2
 

wreck it all 

Members Usage Guide

 

 Please Support My

Partners in Safety!

 

MEA-SFTENG

 

 organdonor

 

 safteng_man

911_4

Some of Our Key Clients

What They Are Saying About Us...

"Bryan worked for me during the time we were both employed at a Great Lakes Chemical Company plant in Omaha. He led the effort to develop a world class safety program in the factory. I found Bryan to be an extremely high principled individual, with boundless energy and a high level of credibility...

Dale Fannin
Date: Apr 01, 2010