|
UPDATED Members area with 189 photos (176 MB) on 2/6/12
Over 9,600 exclusive unsafe acts/conditions and accident/injuries photos from more than 1,725 contributors!
MANY THANKS to my NEW & RENEWING "Partners in Safety" for their support!
|

since 2006
|

since 2007
|

since 2012
|

since 2006
|

since 2010
|
|
|
Last Updated on Monday, 20 February 2012 15:24 |
|
|
Challenging the NH3 Refrigeration & Electrical Classification |
|
Safety Info Posts -
Chemical Process Safety (PSM/RMP)
|
|
Most ammonia refrigeration personnel know their refrigerant is flammable, but most would also tell us that they do not have any "Hazardous Locations" (e.g. Class 1, Div 1 or 2 locations). Most of these workers will explain their ventilation system is designed, installed, and maintained to ensure that NH3 never achieves 25% of it's LEL (e.g. 40,000 ppm), thus allowing the facility to escape the requirement of making their engine room an electrically classified area (e.g. hazardous location). But in these technological days, this may no longer be the case...
|
|
A reverse look at Facility Siting and Change Management |
|
Safety Info Posts -
Chemical Process Safety (PSM/RMP)
|
|
An older post, with updates...Ever since the 2005 BP Texas City tragedy, refineries and chemical plants have been working diligently to review “facility siting” risks for their facilities. As with all of the PSM elements, many of us took this new focus as a learning opportunity. We had all done something we called “facility siting” in our Process Hazards Analysis, but in the early 1990’s many of us “did not know what we did not know” in regards to what a real facility siting analysis was suppose to look like.
|
|
Flashlights Improperly Marked with MSHA Emblem (THEY ARE intrinsically safe - just mislabeled) |
|
21 Incidents & 3 Updates (2/16/12) |
|
Video of the Week #7 - Horseplay |
|
Roof work and proper Fall Protection |
|
Safety Info Posts -
OSHA Compliance Posts
|
|
Let me be clear... I am not a Fall Protection expert in any stretch of the imagination, so I am all about engineering out the fall hazards whenever possible. A few weeks ago we received a call from a new client who had just suffered a bad accident where one of their star employees was on the roof working on a piece of equipment. The roof is perfectly flat and has a raised edge of 27" around it. The employee was working on an environmental control device and as he was trying to pull some duct work up from the roof penetration, he began to step back in order to get the duct work up and out of the roof hole - something he had done dozens of times in the past couple of years. Unfortunately, this time he did it with his back to the edge and as he stepped back with this heavy piece of duct work that was hung up in the penetration, it broke free and he and the duct work took a 30' fall over the edge. He survived merely because he flip in the air and landed on the fiberglass duct work which acted as a cushion. A fractured sternum and several broken ribs and he was back to work four days later on light duty. The results could have EASILY been a fatality; he knows it and the company knows.
|
|
|
Is the act of loading/unloading a PSM/RMP chemical exempt from OSHA/EPA enforcement? |
|
Safety Info Posts -
Chemical Process Safety (PSM/RMP)
|
|
Is the act of loading/unloading a PSM/RMP chemical exempt from OSHA/EPA enforcement? Absolutely not! Somewhere this little fib began and it has spread like wildfire. If you have a release of your HHC/EHS during unloading or loading, rest assured OSHA and/or EPA can investigate and inspection, and here's why...
|
|
How many threads of a bolt must be showing outside a nut to meet RAGAGEP? |
|
Safety Info Posts -
Chemical Process Safety (PSM/RMP)
|
|
Some may claim this to be a trick question. I assure you it is not meant to be, but as I will point out in this posting, having too much bolt extending beyond its nut can be an issue, as well as not having the bolt flush with the outer surface of the nut.
|
|
UPDATE - INCORRECT Metal Scaffold Board ALERT |
|
Safety Info Posts -
Safety Alerts
|
|

Ladies and gentlemen, This false alert is from 2006. Layher has been falsely accused of having a cracked board. Layher does not even weld in that area. You can find the retraction of ISI (the originator) and correction at Layher's web site www.LayherUSA.com or contact Layher under
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
. Best regards,
Frank Frietsch
CLICK HERE to see the correction from Layher
CLICK HERE to see the correction from Industrial Specialist LLC
|
|
Safety Info Posts -
Motivational Safety Materials
|
|
Here we stand
down and dejected
The short cut he took
was not detected
The life he lived
has now been rejected
If only our safety rules
he would have respected
Author: Russ Baxter |
|
|
Can a PHA done for OSHA's PSM be used for EPA's RMP Compliance? |
|
Safety Info Posts -
Chemical Process Safety (PSM/RMP)
|
|
If your Program 3 process is also subject to OSHA PSM, you can use the PHA conducted for OSHA PSM compliance as your initial process hazard analysis for EPA purposes, provided you conducted your initial OSHA PHA prior to May 26, 1997...
|
|
Change(s) that REQUIRE a PHA revalidation |
|
Safety Info Posts -
Chemical Process Safety (PSM/RMP)
|
|
There is some language in the EPA's Risk Management Plan program requirements that tends to cause some confusion...
The owner or operator of a stationary source shall revise and update the RMP submitted under §68.150 as follows:
(5) Within six months of a change that requires a revised PHA or hazard review
So when are we required to "revise our PHA" other than when we have to do our 5-year revalidation?
|
|
26 Incidents & 2 Updates (2/20/12) |
|
Photo of the Week #7 - When to know its time for a new Hard Hat |
|
|