LOTO ProcessI put this image together for a friend struggling to demonstrate to their management that we can not discuss LOTO until Machine Guarding is in place. These two topics go hand in hand and trust me; if there are guarding issues, those hazards will be compounded when we attempt to frame up the LOTO program.

Guarding is for the OPERATIONAL safety of the machine/equipment and, if not done well, poses a big, if not bigger, risk to the workers running the machine/equipment. We routinely encounter serious guarding issues while helping clients with their LOTO efforts, and we are almost always told, "Thanks, but we just want help with LOTO."

Controlling hazardous energy sources (e.g., LOTO) during maintenance and servicing is just as critical but entirely different from guarding. 

Just look at the scope/application of OSHA's 1910.147:

(emphasis by me)

 

1910.147(a)(2)(i) This standard applies to the control of energy during servicing and/or maintenance of machines and equipment.
1910.147(a)(2)(ii) Normal production operations are NOT covered by this standard (See subpart 0 of this part).
Servicing and/or maintenance which takes place during normal production operations is covered by this standard ONLY IF:
1910.147(a)(2)(ii)(A) An employee is required to remove or bypass a guard or other safety device; or
1910.147(a)(2)(ii)(B) An employee is required to place any part of his or her body into an area on a machine or piece of equipment where work is actually performed upon the material being processed (point of operation) or where an associated danger zone exists during a machine operating cycle. 


We see this often; a poorly guarded machine rarely gets locked out for servicing/maintenance since the personnel doing the servicing/maintenance did not have to remove or bypass a guard or other safety device.  The facility's LOTO program (and training) will usually use the exact wording from the standard to DEFINE when LOTO is required; so if the machine is NOT properly guarded, then the "trigger(s)" for LOTO are missing.  Not to mention that the operations personnel are at serious risk of injury due to this improper guarding.

So, as the image above attempts to make clear, our first step in machinery safety is controlling the OPERATIONAL hazards by understanding the Human-Machine Interface (HMI) and properly guarding the hazards associated with OPERATING the machinery./equipment.  Once Stage 1 is complete, then we can move into Stage 2, which occurs when we need to remove or bypass a guard or other safety device in order to perform servicing/maintenance on the machine/equipment.
 
This is what we mean when we say Guarding comes before LOTO.
 

You have no rights to post comments

 
View 's profile on LinkedIn

 

 LinkedIn Group Button

facebookIcon

 

Partner Organizations

 Chlroine Institute Logo 100 years

I am proud to announce that

The Chlorine Institute and SAFTENG

have extended our"Partners in Safety" agreement

for another year (2024)

CI Members, send me an e-mail

to request your FREE SAFTENG membership

 

RCECHILL BW

  

kemkey logo

OHS Solutions logoCEMANE power association logo

 EIT LOGO

 

Member Associations

ASME logo

 

Screen Shot 2018 05 28 at 10.25.35 PM

aiche logo cmyk highres

Chlorine institute

 nfpa logo.5942a119dcb25

 

TOCAS

 

BLR Logo 2018

 

 

 

 

safteng man copy

 

 organdonor