We often refer to the ABC Model when discussing "Behavior Based Safety."  ABC stands for Antecedent  ⇒ BehaviorConsequence

  • An antecedent comes before a behavior and may trigger that behavior.
  • A behavior is what/how the individual does an action. (good or bad).
  • A consequence is something that follows the behavior (good or bad).

So, an OSHA citation could be considered a "consequence" (i.e., a Latent Organizational Failure) of failing to meet OSHA minimum standard(s).  So I ask...

Do OSHA citations change management's behavior?

Let's reflect on a personal scenario of ABC, such as driving.

  • The antecedent is that we are running late for an important meeting.
  • The behavior is we are driving over the posted speed limit.
  • The consequence is we get a speeding ticket.

Getting that speeding ticket is a bit different than the OSHA citations scenario, as this is a consequence of our personal behavior.  Did that speeding ticket, we had to pay out of pocket, change our driving behaviors long-term?  Did we never speed again?

 

So, a management team ends up having to use some "company money" (v.s. their own personal funds) to settle citations and possibly even spend some company money on abatement actions.  Do these consequences change their behaviors (or attitudes) about safety going forward, either short-term or long-term?

 
View 's profile on LinkedIn

 

 LinkedIn Group Button

facebookIcon

 

Partner Organizations

 Chlroine Institute Logo 100 years

I am proud to announce that

The Chlorine Institute and SAFTENG

have extended our"Partners in Safety" agreement

for another year (2024)

CI Members, send me an e-mail

to request your FREE SAFTENG membership

 

RCECHILL BW

  

kemkey logo

OHS Solutions logoCEMANE power association logo

 EIT LOGO

 

Member Associations

ASME logo

 

Screen Shot 2018 05 28 at 10.25.35 PM

aiche logo cmyk highres

Chlorine institute

 nfpa logo.5942a119dcb25

 

TOCAS

 

BLR Logo 2018

 

 

 

 

safteng man copy

 

 organdonor